Monday, December 20, 2010
Wheretaarakmehtashoot
activities, grammar, etc..
http://cp.claracampoamor.fuenlabrada.educa.madrid.org/juegosporareas-lengua.htm
Sunday, August 1, 2010
Do You Think About Meginger Lynn
A BREAKTHROUGH FOR HUMANITY OF THE UN GENERAL ASSEMBLY ADOPTS RESOLUTION ON THE HUMAN RIGHT TO WATER AND SANITATION
Absent: Albania, Belize, Cameroon, Chad, Fiji, Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Kiribati, Malawi, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Micronesia (Federated States of), Mozambique, Namibia, Nauru, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Rwanda, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Sao Tome and Principe, Sierra Leone, Suriname, Swaziland, Tonga, Turkmenistan, Uganda, Uzbekistan.
[start1]
Sixty-fourth session Agenda item 48
Application Integrated and coordinated the results of major conferences and United Nations summits in the economic, social and related fields
Antigua and Barbuda, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Benin, Bolivia (Multinational State of), Burundi, Congo, Cuba, Dominica, Ecuador, El Salvador , Fiji, Georgia, Haiti, Solomon Islands, Madagascar, Mauritius, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Paraguay, Philippines, Dominican Republic, Samoa, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, Saint Lucia, Serbia, Seychelles, Sri Lanka, Tuvalu, Uruguay, Vanuatu, Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) and Yemen: draft resolution
The human right water and sanitation
General Assembly,
Deeply concerned that some 884 million people lack access to safe drinking water and more than 2,600 million people lack access to basic sanitation, and alarmed that die each year about 1.5 million children under 5 years and 443 million lost school days due to diseases related to water and sanitation,
WITH THE SUPPORT OF PANAMA IN a historic vote of 122 countries in favor, 41 abstention and 0 nays, THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY UNITED NATIONS APPROVES RESOLUTION
TEXT PDF AVAILABLE IN http://www.comda.org.mx/files/El% 20derecho% 20humano% 20to% 20agua% 20and% 20the% 20saneamiento.pdf
BELOW THE LIST OF COUNTRIES AND VOTING SPANISH TEXT OF RESOLUTION A/64/L.63/REV.1.
Vote on Human Right to Water
The draft resolution on the human right to water and sanitation (A/64/L.63/REV.1 document) was adopted by a recorded vote of 122 in Favour to none against, with 41 abstentions, as follows:
In Favour: Afghanistan, Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Cape Verde, Central African Republic , Chile, China, Colombia, Comoros, Congo, Costa Rica, Côte d'Ivoire, Cuba, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Finland, France, Gabon, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Grenada, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Italy, Jamaica, Jordan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Liechtenstein, Madagascar, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Mauritius, Mexico, Monaco, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Myanmar, Nepal, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Portugal, Qatar, Russian Federation, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, San Marino, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Seychelles, Singapore, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, Somalia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Switzerland, Syria, Tajikistan, Thailand, The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Timor-Leste, Togo, Tunisia, Tuvalu, United Arab Emirates, Uruguay, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Yemen, Zimbabwe.
Against: None.
Abstain: Armenia, Australia, Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Ethiopia, Greece, Guyana, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Latvia, Lesotho, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Slovakia, Sweden, Trinidad and Tobago, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United Republic of Tanzania, United States, Zambia.
Absent: Albania, Belize, Cameroon, Chad, Fiji, Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Kiribati, Malawi, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Micronesia (Federated States of), Mozambique, Namibia, Nauru, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Rwanda, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Sao Tome and Principe, Sierra Leone, Suriname, Swaziland, Tonga, Turkmenistan, Uganda, Uzbekistan.
A/64/L.63/REV.1
Distr. Límitada
26 de junio de 2010
English Original: English
[start1]
Sixty-fourth session Agenda item 48
Application Integrated and coordinated the results of major conferences and United Nations summits in the economic, social and related fields
Antigua and Barbuda, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Benin, Bolivia (Multinational State of), Burundi, Congo, Cuba, Dominica, Ecuador, El Salvador , Fiji, Georgia, Haiti, Solomon Islands, Madagascar, Mauritius, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Paraguay, Philippines, Dominican Republic, Samoa, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, Saint Lucia, Serbia, Seychelles, Sri Lanka, Tuvalu, Uruguay, Vanuatu, Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) and Yemen: draft resolution
The human right water and sanitation
General Assembly,
Recalling its resolutions 54/175 of 17 December 1999 on the Right to Development, 55/196 of 20 December 2000, which proclaimed 2003 the International Year of Freshwater, 58/217 of 23 December 2003, which proclaimed the International Decade for Action "Water for Life "(2005-2015), 59/228 of 22 December 2004, 61/192 of 20 December 2006, by which it proclaimed 2008 the International Year of Sanitation, and 64/198 of 21 December 2009 on the comprehensive mid-term review of the International Decade for Action "Water for Life" Program June 21, 1992 [1] , the Habitat Agenda 1996 [ 2] , the Plan of Action of Mar del Plata 1977 [3] approved by the United Nations Conference on Water and the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development June 1992 [ 4] ,
Recalling also the Universal Declaration of Human Rights [5] , the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural [6] , the International Covenant on Civil and Políticos6, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms Racial Discrimination [7] , the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women [8] , the Convention on the Rights of the Child [9] , the Convention on the Rights of Persons disabled [10] and the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons Time of War of August 12, 1949 [11] ,
Recalling all previous resolutions of the Council of Human Rights on human rights and access to safe water and sanitation, including Council resolutions 7 / 22 of March 28, 2008, and 12 / 8, 1 October 2009, concerning the human right to water and sanitation, General Comment no. 15 (2002) the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights on the right to water (articles 11 and 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights) [12] and the report of the High Commissioner of United Nations for Human Rights on the scope and content of the relevant obligations in human rights related to access to safe drinking water and sanitation under international human rights instruments [13] , and the report of Independent Expert on the question of human rights obligations related to access to safe water and sanitation [14] ,
Deeply concerned that some 884 million people lack access to safe drinking water and more than 2,600 million people lack access to basic sanitation, and alarmed that die each year about 1.5 million children under 5 years and 443 million lost school days due to diseases related to water and sanitation,
Recognizing the importance of drinking water and sanitation in playing as an integral component of the realization of all human rights,
Reaffirming the responsibility of States to promote and protect all human rights are universal, indivisible, interdependent and interrelated, and must be treated globally in a fair and equitable and equally and receive equal attention,
Mindful of the commitment by the international community to fully implement the Millennium Development Goals, and stressing in this regard the determination of the Heads of State and Government expressed in the Millennium Declaration [15] of halving by 2015 the proportion of people without access to drinking water or can not afford and has no access to basic sanitation, as agreed in the Plan of Implementation adopted at the World Summit for Social Development ("Plan Implementation of the Johannesburg) [16] ,
1. Declares the right to drinking water and sanitation as a human right essential for the full enjoyment of life and all human rights;
2. Calls upon States and international organizations to provide financial resources and foster the capacity building and technology transfer through international assistance and cooperation, in particular developing countries, to intensify efforts furnish the population with affordable access to safe water and sanitation;
3. Welcomes the decision of the Human Rights Council to request the independent expert on the issue of human rights obligations related to access to drinking water and sanitation to submit an annual report to the General Assembly [17] , and encourages the independent expert to continue working on all aspects of its mandate and in consultation with all agencies, funds and programs of the United Nations, to include in its report to the Assembly at its sixty-sixth session of the main difficulties involved in realizing the human right to safe drinking water and sanitation, and the effect of these on the achievement of the Millennium Millennium Development Goals.
* Reissued for technical reasons the July 27, 2010.
[1] Report of the Conference United Nations Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 3 to June 14, 1992, vol. I, Resolutions Adopted by the Conference (United Nations publication, Sales No. E.93.I.8 and corrigendum), resolution 1, annex II.
[2] Report of the United Nations Conference on Human Settlements (Habitat II), Istanbul, 3 to June 14, 1996 (United Nations publication, Sales No. E.97.IV.6 ), chap. I, resolution 1, annex II.
[3] Report of the United Nations Conference on Water, Mar del Plata, 14 to March 25, 1977 (United Nations publication, number Sales S.77.II.A.12), chap. I.
[4] Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 3 to June 14, 1992, vol. I, Resolutions Adopted by the Conference (United Nations publication, Sales No. E.93.I.8 and corrigendum), resolution 1, annex I.
[5] Resolution 217 A (III).
[6] See resolution 2200 A (XXI), annex.
[7] United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 660, no. 9464.
[8] Ibid., Vol. 1249, no. 20378.
[9] Ibid., Vol. 1577, no. 27531.
[10] Resolution 61/106, annex I.
[11] United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 75, no. 973.
[12] See Official Records of the Economic and Social Council, 2003, Supplement No.. 2 (E/2003/22), annex IV.
[13] A/HRC/6/3.
[14] A/HRC/12/24 and Corr.1.
[15] See resolution 55 / 2.
[16] Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development, Johannesburg (South Africa) August 26 to September 4, 2002, (United Nations publication, Sales No. E.03.II.A.1 and correction) chap. 1, resolution 2, annex.
[17] See resolution 12 / 8 of the Human Rights Council.
[2] Report of the United Nations Conference on Human Settlements (Habitat II), Istanbul, 3 to June 14, 1996 (United Nations publication, Sales No. E.97.IV.6 ), chap. I, resolution 1, annex II.
[3] Report of the United Nations Conference on Water, Mar del Plata, 14 to March 25, 1977 (United Nations publication, number Sales S.77.II.A.12), chap. I.
[4] Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 3 to June 14, 1992, vol. I, Resolutions Adopted by the Conference (United Nations publication, Sales No. E.93.I.8 and corrigendum), resolution 1, annex I.
[5] Resolution 217 A (III).
[6] See resolution 2200 A (XXI), annex.
[7] United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 660, no. 9464.
[8] Ibid., Vol. 1249, no. 20378.
[9] Ibid., Vol. 1577, no. 27531.
[10] Resolution 61/106, annex I.
[11] United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 75, no. 973.
[12] See Official Records of the Economic and Social Council, 2003, Supplement No.. 2 (E/2003/22), annex IV.
[13] A/HRC/6/3.
[14] A/HRC/12/24 and Corr.1.
[15] See resolution 55 / 2.
[16] Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development, Johannesburg (South Africa) August 26 to September 4, 2002, (United Nations publication, Sales No. E.03.II.A.1 and correction) chap. 1, resolution 2, annex.
[17] See resolution 12 / 8 of the Human Rights Council.
Friday, June 11, 2010
Software Exceptions C0000005
THOUGHTS ABOUT POVERTY AND THE LAW ON FREEDOM
was 8 and 30 am when the vehicle he was going to carry Tinajitas came to fetch me.
Except a brief stop to buy lunch at the On the rum, only the product of step sound of tires on the vehicle on uneven pavement, cut the conversation with the driver, or the thread of my thoughts on the way to Tinajitas Center.
This chronicle of an announced visit, had home a week before, or perhaps a few years ago.
On Thursday June 3, a gloss of the newspaper El Siglo made known the fact that a mayor of the capital municipality had sanctioned with 30 days of arrest a homeless man, allegedly using administrative provisions that allow punishment of vagrancy.
This information as mentioned above, we worried a lot [1] .
This is because we drew up demand which in turn is submitted against the articles 13 and 14 of Decree No. 1813 mayoral 2000, which established the behavior of vagrancy and their respective administrative penalties.
These rules were later repealed by another provision mayoral.
as he was aware that situation, the gloss of the day motivated me to act.
himself concur June 3 to file a complaint with the Ombudsman's Office regarding this issue. In her call for the immediate release of the convicted, the intercession of the Ombudsman, to tell the mayor related to the case that the rules of vagrancy were repealed, and therefore avoid punishment of persons under the vague charge, and of course refer to coordination chief magistrates of the capital municipality a note for instance that other authorities inform police of the commune, detailed information to the aforementioned mayor.
The next day I will follow up the complaint by the Ombudsman. The official in charge of the proceedings, politely informs me that he had showed up to the Corregedoria, spoke with the mayor, and that it indicated that it had sanctioned the indigent and charged with loitering and trash to be watering, thirty days in jail; but in view of the destitution of the Lord had released. Immediately
thanked the staff of the Ombudsman, Jouchi Melamed, his kindness, and I was relieved for the moment, as there was a humble citizen arbitrarily deprived of his liberty. But I'm the doubt.
On Tuesday June 10th at 9:15 in the morning I approached the Tinajitas Detention Center, which despite receiving only persons allegedly liable to administrative violations, has a history of fatalities resulting from violence in prison, including men deprived of their liberty for breach of maintenance obligations.
Passing the checkpoint, I turn to the court clerk and confirmed that Mr. Benito Rodriguez Harrier is being held at the center since 28 May, and that its passage would meet on 26 June.
request let me talk to Mr. Harrier. After a delay of almost 45 minutes bring him escorted by a custodian.
I had, I would point as I know your case, I had purchased a breakfast to take you, and you wonder how the events that led up Tinajitas.
tells me that he was arrested by the Municipal Police, while walking down the street on May 5. I was not littering. That led to the Corregedoria in turn. Never saw the mayor. I only speak with his secretary who informed him of his punishment for vagrancy. That led to Tinajitas. Upon arrival at the center will play sleep on the floor. "It is the rule," he said. "Every new touch him sleep on the floor, while climbing up to a bed or a hammock."
This is because section 2 where he placed this crowded. While in detention shared space with approximately 120 people.
During the 11 days he had been arrested, Harrier could not communicate with his family or with your partner. "I had no chance, no money to make phone calls," he said.
Harrier, a male Afro-Panamanians, 53, born in the Chorrillo, now lives in the neighborhood of Curundú. Said to have 5 children and a companion, named Marisela Moreno, which should be concerned about not knowing it, for eleven days.
claims to be "study plumber, a carpenter by inheritance and chapistero by street. "
His smile, despite the lack of front teeth, is direct, fresh, lively. Glasses on your hair wear a glimpse of his sight, perhaps his age.
plumbing studies course in the Arts and Crafts, where he graduated in 1973. From his father he inherited the office of Christ, indicating that the wood work, whether fine or rustic.
While speaking with Mr. Harrier, trying to know, my mind kept asking questions about compliance with legal personality, and the consequent right to personal liberty, not suspended in response to economic criteria, as this would defeat principles equality before the law and nondiscrimination.
But all my legal considerations were outweighed by the simple phrases Harrier, when I said "I want to leave here Licen ...."
In that moment I understood, better than in my reading, or in my college years, the value of the right to freedom of movement.
proven the deprivation of liberty of Harrier, I went to the Ombudsman. Arriving
requested appointment Diego Almanza, Deputy Director of the Office of Citizen Guidance, who serves me despite being out for an errand. I hastily explained the situation and is committed as a good as valuable as freedom. Gives instructions to visit the Corregedoria again. We
She showed up with officials from the Ombudsman. The "surprise" Corregidurias officials was great, when I inform you of my interview with Harrier.
We do go to the office of the mayor, who first complained of is "like I can not punish for vagrancy." Presents an Administrative Code published in 1973. There the rule was in effect. We do not agree with it (in a few reflections on vagrancy laws will see why).
Le sustain the repeal of the rules. Duda. Try to prove who knows right. Question on
the source of the complaint. Attempts to justify the "leakage of information." Must come from an alleged pimp who passed. Manda
to buy a new code. "You do not want to commit unlawful acts." I think in part.
Almost half an hour later said "nothing I can hardly give you freedom." It was a favor. No matter. Keep silent. Deliver the ticket to freedom.
We went rushing to Tinajitas. In
delay the judicial process. "They check if you have a pending case" - say. The system refuses to freedom.
I stand alone with an official. We talked. Quick exit. At the time told me about his vocation respect for the law. Just tell me who does not share the punishment of vagrancy. Two months ago, 125 people were punished on that ground. The Municipality had.
silent, and think of how poverty is all the systematic violation of human rights, and as a condition of access to justice ...
Amid heavy rain, a custodian brings Harrier. We got in the car
of advocacy, we'll take you home.
On the way trying to learn more. It has a nice sense of humor.
all laughed.
At 4 and 40 minutes later we reached the end of the Frangipany. Gets off the vehicle. Her slim figure runs, seems not to be touched by the raindrops.
Stops at the courtyard of buildings. A big smile on her face. Shake your arm raised his hand. Farewell with gratitude. Return to freedom.
The Defender vehicle crosses the vehicular arteries, flooded by the tears of heaven. Perhaps
clouds moved, seeing the strange shining light of justice. At least in regard to arbitrary deprivation of liberty, the work was done ...
[1] Atencio Gomez, Victor. Brief reflections on the law of vagrancy. Published on June 4 in the online journal The Freethinker. In this paper presents a succinct reflection legal, about the laws in Panama have enacted vagrancy. Available in http://www.ellibrepensador.com/2010/06/04/breve-reflexion-sobre-las-leyes-de-vagancia/
was 8 and 30 am when the vehicle he was going to carry Tinajitas came to fetch me. Except a brief stop to buy lunch at the On the rum, only the product of step sound of tires on the vehicle on uneven pavement, cut the conversation with the driver, or the thread of my thoughts on the way to Tinajitas Center.
This chronicle of an announced visit, had home a week before, or perhaps a few years ago.
On Thursday June 3, a gloss of the newspaper El Siglo made known the fact that a mayor of the capital municipality had sanctioned with 30 days of arrest a homeless man, allegedly using administrative provisions that allow punishment of vagrancy.
This information as mentioned above, we worried a lot [1] .
This is because we drew up demand which in turn is submitted against the articles 13 and 14 of Decree No. 1813 mayoral 2000, which established the behavior of vagrancy and their respective administrative penalties.
These rules were later repealed by another provision mayoral.
as he was aware that situation, the gloss of the day motivated me to act.
himself concur June 3 to file a complaint with the Ombudsman's Office regarding this issue. In her call for the immediate release of the convicted, the intercession of the Ombudsman, to tell the mayor related to the case that the rules of vagrancy were repealed, and therefore avoid punishment of persons under the vague charge, and of course refer to coordination chief magistrates of the capital municipality a note for instance that other authorities inform police of the commune, detailed information to the aforementioned mayor.
The next day I will follow up the complaint by the Ombudsman. The official in charge of the proceedings, politely informs me that he had showed up to the Corregedoria, spoke with the mayor, and that it indicated that it had sanctioned the indigent and charged with loitering and trash to be watering, thirty days in jail; but in view of the destitution of the Lord had released. Immediately
thanked the staff of the Ombudsman, Jouchi Melamed, his kindness, and I was relieved for the moment, as there was a humble citizen arbitrarily deprived of his liberty. But I'm the doubt.
On Tuesday June 10th at 9:15 in the morning I approached the Tinajitas Detention Center, which despite receiving only persons allegedly liable to administrative violations, has a history of fatalities resulting from violence in prison, including men deprived of their liberty for breach of maintenance obligations.
Passing the checkpoint, I turn to the court clerk and confirmed that Mr. Benito Rodriguez Harrier is being held at the center since 28 May, and that its passage would meet on 26 June.
request let me talk to Mr. Harrier. After a delay of almost 45 minutes bring him escorted by a custodian.
I had, I would point as I know your case, I had purchased a breakfast to take you, and you wonder how the events that led up Tinajitas.
tells me that he was arrested by the Municipal Police, while walking down the street on May 5. I was not littering. That led to the Corregedoria in turn. Never saw the mayor. I only speak with his secretary who informed him of his punishment for vagrancy. That led to Tinajitas. Upon arrival at the center will play sleep on the floor. "It is the rule," he said. "Every new touch him sleep on the floor, while climbing up to a bed or a hammock."
This is because section 2 where he placed this crowded. While in detention shared space with approximately 120 people.
During the 11 days he had been arrested, Harrier could not communicate with his family or with your partner. "I had no chance, no money to make phone calls," he said.
Harrier, a male Afro-Panamanians, 53, born in the Chorrillo, now lives in the neighborhood of Curundú. Said to have 5 children and a companion, named Marisela Moreno, which should be concerned about not knowing it, for eleven days.
claims to be "study plumber, a carpenter by inheritance and chapistero by street. "
His smile, despite the lack of front teeth, is direct, fresh, lively. Glasses on your hair wear a glimpse of his sight, perhaps his age.
plumbing studies course in the Arts and Crafts, where he graduated in 1973. From his father he inherited the office of Christ, indicating that the wood work, whether fine or rustic.
While speaking with Mr. Harrier, trying to know, my mind kept asking questions about compliance with legal personality, and the consequent right to personal liberty, not suspended in response to economic criteria, as this would defeat principles equality before the law and nondiscrimination.
But all my legal considerations were outweighed by the simple phrases Harrier, when I said "I want to leave here Licen ...."
In that moment I understood, better than in my reading, or in my college years, the value of the right to freedom of movement.
proven the deprivation of liberty of Harrier, I went to the Ombudsman. Arriving
requested appointment Diego Almanza, Deputy Director of the Office of Citizen Guidance, who serves me despite being out for an errand. I hastily explained the situation and is committed as a good as valuable as freedom. Gives instructions to visit the Corregedoria again. We
She showed up with officials from the Ombudsman. The "surprise" Corregidurias officials was great, when I inform you of my interview with Harrier.
We do go to the office of the mayor, who first complained of is "like I can not punish for vagrancy." Presents an Administrative Code published in 1973. There the rule was in effect. We do not agree with it (in a few reflections on vagrancy laws will see why).
Le sustain the repeal of the rules. Duda. Try to prove who knows right. Question on
the source of the complaint. Attempts to justify the "leakage of information." Must come from an alleged pimp who passed. Manda
to buy a new code. "You do not want to commit unlawful acts." I think in part.
Almost half an hour later said "nothing I can hardly give you freedom." It was a favor. No matter. Keep silent. Deliver the ticket to freedom.
We went rushing to Tinajitas. In
delay the judicial process. "They check if you have a pending case" - say. The system refuses to freedom.
I stand alone with an official. We talked. Quick exit. At the time told me about his vocation respect for the law. Just tell me who does not share the punishment of vagrancy. Two months ago, 125 people were punished on that ground. The Municipality had.
silent, and think of how poverty is all the systematic violation of human rights, and as a condition of access to justice ...
Amid heavy rain, a custodian brings Harrier. We got in the car
of advocacy, we'll take you home.
On the way trying to learn more. It has a nice sense of humor.
all laughed.
At 4 and 40 minutes later we reached the end of the Frangipany. Gets off the vehicle. Her slim figure runs, seems not to be touched by the raindrops.
Stops at the courtyard of buildings. A big smile on her face. Shake your arm raised his hand. Farewell with gratitude. Return to freedom.
The Defender vehicle crosses the vehicular arteries, flooded by the tears of heaven. Perhaps
clouds moved, seeing the strange shining light of justice. At least in regard to arbitrary deprivation of liberty, the work was done ...
[1] Atencio Gomez, Victor. Brief reflections on the law of vagrancy. Published on June 4 in the online journal The Freethinker. In this paper presents a succinct reflection legal, about the laws in Panama have enacted vagrancy. Available in http://www.ellibrepensador.com/2010/06/04/breve-reflexion-sobre-las-leyes-de-vagancia/
Friday, June 4, 2010
What Does A Low Body Temp Mean, 96.5?
Thursday, May 27, 2010
Much Does Cost Have Cyst Removed
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
How Long Does Oxycettrocycline
Decoration · Memories (Baby Shower, Birthday, Thank You Visit)
Wood Children
(Remembrance Baby Shower, Birthday, Thank You cards)
(también como colgante)
( Recuerdo cumpleaños , baby shower )
( Recuerdo para Baby Shower, Cumpleaños y Agradecimiento visita)
( Baby Shower )
(Baby Shower Decoration )
(Baby Shower Decoration and Birthday)
( baby shower decoration , birthday gift)
( Baby Shower, Birthday)
(Baby Shower Decoration gift for baby)
(Decoration baby shower, gift for baby)
( Baby Shower )
Bouquets (Remembrance Baby Shower, Birthday, Thank You cards)
(Remembrance Baby Shower, Birthday, Thank You cards)
(Remembrance Baby Shower, Birthday, Thank You cards)
Wood Children (Remembrance Baby Shower, Birthday, Thank You cards)
(Remembrance Baby Shower, Birthday, Thank views)
(Remembrance Baby Shower, Birthday, Thank views)
Saturday, March 27, 2010
Letter To Mtnl To Disconnect Telephone Line
Popular Queries: Comparative Experiences
By Victor G. Atencio Human rights activist
In moments when I feel that we need Patria, Republic and Freedom, and given the Government's call to consult the public on various topics, and comments and discussions on this call; I've been to find the rules and experiences of other countries, in order to get a more or less informed opinion on the matter. So I read
standards of countries like Spain, Mexico, Colombia, Argentina, and see recently, issues such as the transfer of a Moai to France (March 1, 2010), or the payment of compensation to the UK and Holland by the crisis in the banking system (March 6, 2010), were asked to the people of Easter Island in Chile and Iceland respectively, each with negative results.
In this search I also found the Act No. 4 of March 17, 2010, issued by the Parliament of Catalonia, which is about referendums via referendum.
As this is perhaps the most recent standard issued in the world on the subject, I shall briefly disclose some points that I find interesting for the debate in our country is promoted, with the caveat that even this latest standard is had its detractors (on the objections of Deputy dollors Battle may be the next league http://www.intereconomia.com/noticias-gaceta/politica/cataluna-podra-celebrar-referendos-permiso-del-estado ) and that to understand it, must take into account the particular political and legal system of Spain.
The Preamble highlights the objectives of the Government to "encourage participation and increase the quality of democracy to encourage implementation of mechanisms for citizen participation, to next administration and ensure the participation of citizens in making decisions that affect their interests", and later enter define referendum by referendum (art. 3) as "an instrument of direct participation to determine the will of the electorate on policy issues of particular importance to the guarantees of the electoral process."
Within the Law of Catalonia, there are provisions that allow queries can be made on issues covering the powers of the Government or the City Council. However it requires the approval of the English government.
popular consultations via referendum can be, depending on who holds the initiative, institutional or popular initiative (Article 11). Those under the Government a proposal of the President, Parliament a proposal for a fifth of the deputies or two parliamentary groups, or 10% of the municipalities that must represent at least 500 thousand people (art. 15).
popular consultations via referendum on popular initiative may be driven by the citizens of Catalonia, provided they have the support of 3% of population (which in January 2008 amounted to 7,364,078 inhabitants), whose signatures must be collected within six months. The popular initiative inquiries are forbidden to touch or budgetary tax issues, love the general prohibitions of the art. 6 extend to all queries, which states that these can not go against the powers that the Constitution and the Statute of Autonomy recognized institutions of the Government and local authorities, or may be formulated so that a bill affecting or bill that is pending in Parliament.
consultations via referendum on a municipal level, can play songs to the jurisdiction of the municipality and local, with the exception of matters relating to local finance or prohibitions of art. 6. In this area the initiative can also be institutional or popular.
The rule also talks about when queries are binding or advisory, and thus when the Government must act on the results, information campaigns, access to media and public spaces for the dissemination of the campaigns informative, such access free of charge (such as in municipal areas, or in the media state-owned), according to criteria of equal opportunities for the dissemination of each of the positions on consultation issues, among others.
also regulates matters such as absentee ballots, whether from electronic voting, petitions by electronic means, so any sort of arrangements specific to the democracies of the twenty-first century.
So, we recognize that we have not exhausted the contents of the Law on referendum in Catalonia.
only hope to contribute modestly, by this means, the promotion of references, comparative in nature, which serve to nourish the seminal debate on the issue of Panama, because we have the conviction that well-targeted public consultations can be a important tool for improvement of our democracy, especially if we draft a rule to facilitate this mission, and avoid falling into the temptation to submit to referendum, issues that should be forbidden in liberal democracies (can remember my position on the death penalty in visible http://www.laestrella.com.pa/mensual/2010/03/16/contenido/212793.asp ).
wish, so be it.
In moments when I feel that we need Patria, Republic and Freedom, and given the Government's call to consult the public on various topics, and comments and discussions on this call; I've been to find the rules and experiences of other countries, in order to get a more or less informed opinion on the matter. So I read
standards of countries like Spain, Mexico, Colombia, Argentina, and see recently, issues such as the transfer of a Moai to France (March 1, 2010), or the payment of compensation to the UK and Holland by the crisis in the banking system (March 6, 2010), were asked to the people of Easter Island in Chile and Iceland respectively, each with negative results.
In this search I also found the Act No. 4 of March 17, 2010, issued by the Parliament of Catalonia, which is about referendums via referendum.
As this is perhaps the most recent standard issued in the world on the subject, I shall briefly disclose some points that I find interesting for the debate in our country is promoted, with the caveat that even this latest standard is had its detractors (on the objections of Deputy dollors Battle may be the next league http://www.intereconomia.com/noticias-gaceta/politica/cataluna-podra-celebrar-referendos-permiso-del-estado ) and that to understand it, must take into account the particular political and legal system of Spain.
The Preamble highlights the objectives of the Government to "encourage participation and increase the quality of democracy to encourage implementation of mechanisms for citizen participation, to next administration and ensure the participation of citizens in making decisions that affect their interests", and later enter define referendum by referendum (art. 3) as "an instrument of direct participation to determine the will of the electorate on policy issues of particular importance to the guarantees of the electoral process."
Within the Law of Catalonia, there are provisions that allow queries can be made on issues covering the powers of the Government or the City Council. However it requires the approval of the English government.
popular consultations via referendum can be, depending on who holds the initiative, institutional or popular initiative (Article 11). Those under the Government a proposal of the President, Parliament a proposal for a fifth of the deputies or two parliamentary groups, or 10% of the municipalities that must represent at least 500 thousand people (art. 15).
popular consultations via referendum on popular initiative may be driven by the citizens of Catalonia, provided they have the support of 3% of population (which in January 2008 amounted to 7,364,078 inhabitants), whose signatures must be collected within six months. The popular initiative inquiries are forbidden to touch or budgetary tax issues, love the general prohibitions of the art. 6 extend to all queries, which states that these can not go against the powers that the Constitution and the Statute of Autonomy recognized institutions of the Government and local authorities, or may be formulated so that a bill affecting or bill that is pending in Parliament.
consultations via referendum on a municipal level, can play songs to the jurisdiction of the municipality and local, with the exception of matters relating to local finance or prohibitions of art. 6. In this area the initiative can also be institutional or popular.
The rule also talks about when queries are binding or advisory, and thus when the Government must act on the results, information campaigns, access to media and public spaces for the dissemination of the campaigns informative, such access free of charge (such as in municipal areas, or in the media state-owned), according to criteria of equal opportunities for the dissemination of each of the positions on consultation issues, among others.
also regulates matters such as absentee ballots, whether from electronic voting, petitions by electronic means, so any sort of arrangements specific to the democracies of the twenty-first century.
So, we recognize that we have not exhausted the contents of the Law on referendum in Catalonia.
only hope to contribute modestly, by this means, the promotion of references, comparative in nature, which serve to nourish the seminal debate on the issue of Panama, because we have the conviction that well-targeted public consultations can be a important tool for improvement of our democracy, especially if we draft a rule to facilitate this mission, and avoid falling into the temptation to submit to referendum, issues that should be forbidden in liberal democracies (can remember my position on the death penalty in visible http://www.laestrella.com.pa/mensual/2010/03/16/contenido/212793.asp ).
wish, so be it.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)