Well, this post is a bit special. Is very long, do not be scared. It happens that I eat on Saturday with my family, and the demo has been controversial in Euskadi has been much discussed in depth on the subject of terrorism and the good and bad. It warmed me today helmets. I assure you that anything written below is vain or easy as pie. Behind and there is no reflection data and no experience and no work. Castilian is on because this is a letter ell @ s, and we communicate regularly Castilian respect to the data, although I would say that because I have no forces today to put the appropriate links to the sources and concepts. All you have Internet and you can investigate what is of interest. You will find that speak many times at 2. Rd singular (Tu). But it is only a resource for the message is more direct. In my heart I speak in much of the time in 1 st plural (We). I include myself and blame themselves for everything that I accuse. For the record. This is material for reflection and self-criticism, not an exercise in vanity or "guai go." I offer it with love, receive him with affection. It would welcome any feedback indicating that it took 9 hours doing the jerk. And all without scrubbing!
Mecagüenla ... ...
Anyway, here goes:
To begin this session in which I am going to be brainwashed with a mop of 8, I like to try a nonsense that has occurred to me to see how we go from prejudice:
GORA
EUSKAL COUNTRY!
• Which sound? You associate with what acts?
VIVA SPAIN!
• Which sound? You associate with what acts?
• Aside from language, is there any other difference between these messages?
• Do you know approximately how many people that killed Al Qaeda in the Twin Towers?
• Do you know any anecdote or story, or profession, or you can put a face to a victim / family / firefighter related to the 11-S?
• Do you know approximately how many people say U.S. killed in Afghanistan after the 11-S?
• Do you know any anecdote or story, or profession, or you can put a face to a victim / family / firefighter Afghan related to post 11-S?
• Do you know approximately how many people say U.S. killed in Iraq?
• Do you know approximately how many people say U.S. killed in Vietnam?
• Can you say approximately how many people killed in Hiroshima and Nagasaki U.S.?
• Can you say approximately how many "prisoners" passed by the U.S. base in Guantanamo?
• Can you say approximately how many are there now and what are the prospects?
. Would you say you have an opinion about the Basque conflict?
• Would you know that when he began the Basque conflict?
• Do you know what is the difference between Euskadi Euskal-Herria?
• If you are in a mani and a guy with a tissue Palestine is set to howl at your side: ETA Kampor! ETA Kampor! EUSKADI GORA ASKATUTÁ !!... you how to react?
• Would you know Euskadi Ta Askatasuna translate?
• Do you know what school of thought is based ETA? (Note: "murderers" is not an ideological trend, and "terrorism" either.)
• (What the demo shouted was: "eta out, eta outside Euskadi live free.")
• Do you know where it comes euskara? How many different Euskara is spoken in Euskal-Herria?
. On a scale of 1 to 10, where to situate your knowledge of the history of Euskadi?
. On a scale of 1 to 10, where to situate your knowledge of Basque culture and traditions?
each with their conclusion, and now the question itself:
• Would you say that you have clearly defined what is terrorism?
WHAT IS TERRORISM?
let us begin to establish concepts for the definition of the Real Academia de la Lengua:
" terrorism. 1. M. domination by terror. 2. M. violence Succession ejecutados para infundir terror.
Demasiado amplio, aquí pueden entrar desde determinados modelos de padre/madre a un domador de leones o un niño algo bromista y algo bruto. Veamos cómo lo define Naciones Unidas:
«Cualquier acto criminal dirigido contra un estado y encaminado a o calculado para crear un estado de terror en las mentes de personas particulares, de un grupo de personas o del público en general.»
“Contra un estado”. Me confunde, porque no le veo el sentido a realizar un acto criminal contra un estado para “crear un estado de terror en las mentes de personas particulares”, pero luego hace una reiteración sin specify "directed against a state"
"The General Assembly of the United Nations reiterates that criminal acts designed or calculated to provoke a state of terror in the general public, a group of persons or particular persons for political purposes are unjustifiable any circumstances, whatever the political, philosophical, ideological, racial, ethnic, religious or other nature that may be invoked to justify them. "
In my opinion, create a state of terror in the general public for purposes policy is very common in today's democracies, and therefore available for one or more audiovisual equipment installed in the home of every citizen, always more comfortable in front of the house and pouring continually interested and information unidirectionally. In my view, and in strict compliance with the UN definition, opposition politics alarmist, apocalyptic doom, and even developed by Rajoy's PP in the current legislature could be called a terrorist. Or used to justify the presence of cameras rolling everywhere: the intangible "insecurity," I do not I run for anything more than that, people are saying that a lot. If this perception that made him Anabel insurance lower car door while I bought a loaf of bread at 10 pm in summer, 5 feet away and right in the Eixample. That is the result of creating terror for political ends, neither more nor less. Not that my sister is a caguicas, who jumped from a bridge into the void, and that a caguicas does not!
Well, now an analysis of the term in wikipedia:
"Terrorism is undoubtedly a term that has suffered a serious abuse of language by the states that intentionally seek to discredit its enemies. So the Nazis called terrorists Jews who rebelled in Warsaw, in apartheid South Africa was said many blacks were terrorist activities, the French said the same of Algerians who opposed the domination of France (and in some cases used terrorist methods.) During the twentieth century were accused terrorists indiscriminately to multiple South American guerrillas. In the situation of occupation of Iraq, launched by the United States in 2003, it is difficult to draw the line between terrorism and resistance. "
not quite bright? Okay, so we ended up with the definitions with what has been described as a scholarly consensus, an agreement among specialists that, according to the formulation of such a Schmid can be expressed as:
" Terrorism is an anxiety-producing method based on repeated violent action by an individual or group (semi-) clandestine or by state agents, for idiosyncratic reasons, criminal or political, in which - in contrast to assassination - the direct targets of violence are not the main targets. The immediate human victims of violence are generally chosen randomly (targets of opportunity) of a target population, and are used for generating a message. Communication processes based on the threat - and violence - including the terrorist (terrorist organization), endangered victims and the main targets are used to manipulate the target audiences, making them the target of terror, white or white demands attention, as is sought primarily their intimidation, their coercion or propaganda. "
The definition I like. Fits right there I want to emphasize terrorism and analyze: that exercised by the states through the police and security forces towards particular sectors of its population.
I give you an example: if a major event is celebrated as a State Summit, the Olympics, a World Exposition, a G8 or a Holy Year, to name a few, occurs before and during this act a "clean systematic "in the" lower orders "of the host city, in order to do away with unsightly she" riffraff "out of resources and discourage potential germ and in their collective protests by critics or the public expression of dissent. This in the English state is normally charged to the National Police, with the exception of Euskadi and Catalonia have their own police forces, specifically the UIR, the rapid response units known as "SWAT" in which also fit riot units, always place displaced from other parts of the state to minimize subsequent problems population (no one knows anyone.) Your brutal and humiliating methods are well known for socially disadvantaged groups and / or critical expression generators in the city of turn. And totally unknown and invisible to the decent and right-thinking people, completely alien to the "lower layers" and can not or will not conceive that such a reality happening in their cities. On these groups falls hard pressure to bear, based on deductions (not arrests) arbitrary and frequent, violent records by threats and blows into portals or vans (never on the street) to systematically tear or damage to any personal property (glasses, clothes, bracelets, books, whatever), periods of hours to leave the city under threat of serious injury, allegations ridiculous as possession of sharp objects in a pocket having a bic pen cap, weapons possession and carrying a scythe (was to prune the kid), continuing threats to "put you" some "brown" unresolved or appear in your pockets things that were not previously, all in Santiago de Compostela. Or two nights at the station of Via Laietana and 10 days on the Barcelona model, (I got rid of hairs, fluke) to smack my friend clean Maguila to confess to what dark fate in the car we had a camping-gas (para calentar latas de comida) y varias bolas de malabares (con las que nos buscábamos la vida), objetos que, a pesar de que alguno no me creerá, aparecieron al día siguiente en una foto del periódico al lado de pistolas, bates de béisbol y banderas con esvásticas nazis con el siguiente pie:
“Material intervenido a radicales de extrema izquierda” .
Bien, pues en este ejemplo se ve todo claramente: Población blanco : pobres, okupas, antisistemas, inmigrantes y demás escoria social. Blancos de oportunidad y transmisores del mensaje : las víctimas de las palizas, amenazas humillaciones y detenciones arbitrarias, que multiply and spread unintentionally terror and deterrence to tell his story to others. For example I told you that as I got out of Pedroso walk a night of Holy Year 1993, meshing with blows and bleeding like a pig, humiliated, angry and with a terrible desire to get even one day, yes, to return violence as well as terror to the marrow of my bones after a trip encased in a metal floor grillera, handcuffed between the boots of three policemen who would not let me lift his head as he got punched and kicked all over the sound of their laughter without knowing where they were taking me or what or why, absolutely helpless and at the mercy of will and the whim of armed men who seemed to have much fun with these issues. The crime deserves such punishment was not wearing the ID card and have required you to me "pints."
• "sure you hang out with the squatters, jjojojoooj, as we have come pa us pa" squatters "to you, jajajajaaj ..."
I want to emphasize the systematic and repetitive nature of these criminal acts in the preparation of a city for a certain ostentation. Damn!, Roberto and tod @ s, are not isolated acts of rogue elements NI "freaks." Acts are inscribed within a clear national strategy of deterrence through the terror of marginalized groups unresponsive and with no political credibility. This lack of social credibility is reflected in chronic impunity for such acts by the lack of a structure that supports your complaint (if you dare report), because nobody believes you. And when you get to a "sanctimonious" I believe in regard to the attack (something very rare) you find that no one can remove the "something would" draw your gesture. That's very humiliating, not what you imagine.
Finally, in my opinion this is terrorism. Is called state terrorism. And if now you want to laugh at my crazy fantasies, go ahead. It is less complicated. Now I
talk about something else, another wild fantasy of mine ...
THE EMPIRE OF TERROR (like all empires ...)
Now, kidnap someone, a person, you for example to get through the terror elements useful for developing my political project ... is that a terrorist act? And if I put you in a cell? Terrorism Is it so? What if I get into the hideout for 5 years, 1,825 days are one after another? Am I a terrorist? And if my motivation to kidnap you and put you in a cell for 1,825 days of your precious life is justified by a political-military strategy? Then is terrorism or not? And if you getting into a hideout for 5 years based on my political-military strategy will occasionally tortured? But "tortus" fun eh? no blood ... to see what I can think of ... for example, imagine: you strip, you chained to a chair bolted to the floor, and I put some nice music and strobe lights, trash-metal or rap in Chinese coming to 200W per channel from speakers attached to your ear while a cold air system cools your body, your blood and your soul with very low temperatures for hours. How are you? What fun? It is terrorism or not yet? And yes, I put on fatigues, I bring a equipillo of doctors and psychologists (who have bad face), to advise me about your mental health, your vulnerabilities and your endurance so you can submit yourself to the maximum pain, isolation, confusion and despair as possible and obtain better results? That terrorism will be ?.....
Man, you will agree with me that a little scared and gives, eh?
While waiting, I'm thinking better than in the hideout, (who after all are luxury and not plan) I'll put in a cage. Yes, yes, a cage like those of rabbits, mesh. To piss up. And tied his hands and feet shackled, so the longer step you can take is 30 cm, so you gets more space. And I'll put your cage outside, weather is very healthy. As you see it? Na, a bit of sun by day and a little cold at night, a little water if it rains, but very airy!
Now imagine that when all this started, when I got into this cage so entertaining, you were a child 13 years tending sheep ... (by the way, congratulations, you're now an adult, as time goes by ... even if it in your cage, as you are devoid of any right, not much use, especially now that they no longer even know what's your name, and do not recognize or the mother who bore you ...)
then? I am a terrorist or just a psychopath? A psychopath I can not be, remember that my motivation is political-military and external and internal unemotional. I am also embedded in a hierarchical structure that justifies me and that I'm just an arm executor. Come to me that record, I am a "Mandaa." In my dome I says, "hit him a shot at that, you deserve to die" and I hit it. Or "Put a bomb on the other" and I do blow. Sometimes there are small children where I put the bomb before it exploded and I tell my command:
- "Children"
But a look from her is enough for me to press the button with care:
Patapum!
And children flying through the air into pieces as a child.
gives me some qualms, but the dome is supposed to always know who should be eliminated, who deserves to die and who not. I will not decide that myself! I simply puncture the skull to whom I say, put bombs where I sorted and kidnapping and torture those I listed. Period. The organization knows what to do.
At this point, what do you say? Am I or am not a terrorist? As said above it seems that I have painted ... and to you I have screwed up in your cage of terror .... Well, you and half the planet Earth. However
not without grace, mind you, that newspapers and TV what they say is that the terrorist in this story is YOU. They also say that "something you do" to treat you well, if not explained.
Well, unemployment and by example, which as you may have guessed is set in Guantánamo. The data that I have been well documented in two reports of the International Red Cross and Amnesty International. Yes dear, Afghans were abducted illegally by direct order from the U.S. Government who entered the base with 13, and 15 and 16 and 17. But that (his age) is anecdotal. Everything else, torture, times, and inhumane conditions and systematic rape ramplante the most basic human rights are widespread.
These people carried tucked in Guantanamo five years now. FIVE YEARS. Without trial or indictment. Ortega Lara was 532 days, just a year and a half (I say to compare cruelties, without showing any)
What I want to illustrate that I wrote is my opinion. And my opinion is that without any doubt or nuance POSSIBLE must admit the idea that many states called "democratic" (in this case the Federal Republic of the United States of America), use terror, TERROR in letters and in bold, as an instrument of state to serve their interests on several fronts simultaneously, and without any impediment to it being in contravention of a large articulated their own constitutions:
1 - As an instrument of ideological manipulation, and intervention and channeled currents of opinion among its citizens. This type of terrorism is more subtle, and is developed mainly through the mass media. Its outcome is to get a citizenship "sanctimonious" docile and uncritical. A good example we have in the media development of the events after the 11-S, in the U.S. and outside the U.S..
2 - As an instrument of unlawful intervention in foreign nations destabilizing sovereign, in order to promote changes policy to facilitate better market conditions or better geostrategic through assassinations, kidnappings and manipulation of information, in addition to funding, equipment, training and logistical support of armed groups opposing the government in place (although this has been established through a democratic process ) That is what is known in other contexts such as terrorist groups, carried out by more or less secret agencies like the CIA, the Mossad, the M16 or so patriotic CESID. For example, Cuba, Iraq, Vietnam, Congo, Somalia, Honduras, El Salvador, Panama, Argentina, Chile, Palestine, the Sahara and a long etc..
3 - As an instrument facilitator of control and surveillance of citizens by the state through its security forces and armies, whose ubiquity and abusive methods are justified by purely subjective perceptions and generally accepted without analysis by an uncritical mass, such as the famous "uncertainty citizen "and the equally famous" terrorist threat ", even though these methods (arbitrary detentions, suspension of basic rights, legal absence, isolation, torture, murder 1st degree, inhumane prison regimes, abrogation of the right to privacy / communications privacy, etc.. etc.) infringe, I repeat, their own very democratic constitutions.
4 - As an instrument of coercion and repression after the first, groups or individuals with differing or uncomfortable and frightening the disproportionate use of brute force and non-rehabilitative prison system. In the English state, for example, have been dissolved recently by armed men who causes terror base to give blows to the head and kicked and stamped on strong with military boots, submachine release by rubber bullets (rubber on the outside, the soul is steel, friend, and if you get in the wrong place will kill you or leave you blind or stupid) concentrations of collective protest as "suspected" of violating civil peace as they could be farmers, retired early, the ATS or the very Fire. And this is not the worst. The worst thing is that somehow you have taken as normal. Do not be shocked.
All this I write to open a reflection on what is terrorism, who uses it and for what purposes, because in my opinion, as I said, is not exclusive to pro-independence groups or anything, but currency current in the context of world politics (also from the legitimated by democratic constitutions).
And now I'd like to think a tad about what is that to "negotiate with terrorists."
Do you agree with me that the U.S. uses terrorism to maintain its advantage over the other nations of the world? (I refer to their own, and they kidded by his CIA, the Pentagon and the Marines, not the bounce that comes, and I refer to the example of Guantanamo for pristine clarity.)
If you do not make an effort and for argument. If you tell me
Breaking negotiations with the U.S. to use terror to achieve their political ends?
Do we break it publicly kill their own citizens with monstrous devices as the electric chair with a broken neck in a noose?
Do we break because we are passed over and pissed on by lining the UN Constitution and also to boast about it? Do
break because they meen to others (for now) and switch over to the lining of the Geneva Convention and also to boast about it?
break because WE Do shit over and pass through the lining of the Kyoto Protocol and they are the main contributors to climate change, and to boast of it with contempt even though its position will cost MANY MILLIONS OF HUMAN LIFE (if not all ...)?
I'm talking about 3 for Humanity basic treaties that the U.S. does not respect and contempt, not a "take away beyond those missiles."
What, not enough "obvious" or sufficient "real" all this? Can not you concerned?
That I'm an exaggerated? What dramatize much? What I'm manipulating?
Does it seem like a threat (terror) to you what is happening on a planetary level? Can there
threat (terror) is more pressing than the certain extinction of life as we know it if not radical change and economic model NOW and scale of values?
So why do not we in excited expressions of "good citizens" to say "enough" to the rule of terror exercised by the U.S. and predatory culture on our planet and its inhabitants?
Why do you stubbornly looking the other way?
You who ever you buy a pin Gestoras pro Amnesty, or would leave a penny in a tavern herriko (or even come in, because "you know" what's inside a tavern herriko, is not it?) Or solidarity bond you buy one because you think (like me) that this fund a terrorist organization and you think consistent with what you think. And until you fall within acceptable ethical parameters. And on top is something that you "have very clear" Is not it? But Americans consume unqualified products, you spend your money in American movies that always reinforces your rotten values. Consumption and expand its culture, of course, voluntarily and because "you love", another approach would make you an idiot with no personality. You try from time to time to justify its economic model, in finding "good" things, to see his party "logic." Even you've found looking at ways and arguments to justify that in 1945 300,000 people have destroyed two slaps in Japan. 90,000 in a moment, the other following days / months / years of horrific agony. You try to think that those who are killing innocent children and civilians in Iraq to secure oil 'need' have nothing to do with the McBurger that you like zamparte (only very occasionally, I know ...). You make real efforts to intellectual aberrations can not ignore not as aberrant, trying to see his point of view, trying to put on your skin, because it may well not feel that what they defend is so far away from your beliefs and values, " or not? Although do not go your accounts of justice or of ethics or morals, do efforts to try to understand and justify them, do efforts, confiésatelo, to adapt their theories your reality, because if you do not get your intellect one day you will say you are living off the death and suffering of other human beings, which makes you a heartless bastard materialistic and selfish, and you know that you that. So there must be another explanation, but as you see that you are not purely and simply decided to stop thinking about it, at least while it lasts your McBurguer. Yum yum. At least while we ETAs to put the real face of terrorism, which are clearly distinct from the murderers good in that you need not make the slightest intellectual effort to see from their point of view, to put on your skin.
for? If not Plasma TVs offer .... Yum Yum
"The world is like, I did not invent it." Yum Yum
And children flew into pieces as a child. Yum Yum
negotiate with terrorists is wrong, you have to do is isolate them and kill them
Yum Yum
Unless they offer me a good life and consciousness springs. And the illusion of living the good side. And one way to become ever richer. And a plasma TV to see the cops and robbers series they produce. So that my children are kept seeing the cops always win because they defend The Law and The Law is Reason and is good and because they have an aim scrotumtightening, not bad, that having no law nor reason are bad in everything, even shooting. And also to understand, (because I am not able to explain even "know"), you see two people loving each other between gentle caresses and sweet words is an immoral act, a slut and a disgrace, and instead see one person takes the lives of others without blinking an eye is fun, and wonderful if the dead were from the bad. Yum Yum
Because I'm good. That I have it clear. Yum Yum
Yum Yum Yum Yum Yum Yum Yum Yum Yum Yum
Jo, which is rich!
Loads of love, Ex
PostData:
Although I am also critical of the government of "ZAPATEIRA" that calificais "weak" is a detailed and highly relevant his action will cost me forget .
The detail was not swallowed up (knowing that he would fall over) to the passage of the flag of a terrorist nation, as we have seen incidents and terrorists are using methods that kill children and civilians indiscriminately can avoid it, that supports the death penalty as an option punishment, and has subjected the world body to unprecedented economic blackmail. And do not be lifted despite it (so they say) the most powerful nation on earth.
This gesture was a dignity, forthrightness and a result so alien to the common political language they do not deserve our short memory. The action was
us out bravely and in the shortest imaginable time of war is absolutely unjust, illegal, unjustifiable in the eyes of the majority of the population, in which Mr. Aznar, Rajoy, Acebes and company got to Spain by sequestering will of the people and ignoring the opposition, expressed loud and clear in Congress and in Parliament, across the country to participate in such an aberration.
Are we no longer remember this?
How these characters have the nerve to continue reviewing and talking and criticizing filled right about this and that as such? How come there is no penalty for that crime? Is it that nothing has happened? Was it a trifle? The decision taken unilaterally by the PP government of Spain to enter into an illegitimate war alongside the U.S. and the UK (and I repeat, with the country's vociferous opposition) is the end of the match that ended 273 lives mowing the 11-M . And I see as hot dogs, thinking like that, not ashamed of anything, not regret anything.
I, personally, I'm dying of disgust when I hear you accuse others. And, the truth, "ZAPATEIRA" I passed that.
Besos.
0 comments:
Post a Comment